"Science may be described as the art of systematic over-simplification."
-Karl Popper
A miscellany of under-researched ideas.
Some of these may've been thought of before. If they have been, put a link in a comment and I'll be happy to acknowledge prior art.
All original ideas and inventions here and the text itself are open-source and are licenced under the GNU General Public Licence.
Thursday, 19 March 2015
HonestJohn
We now have good encrypted means of communication that allow people to talk with each other in complete confidentiality. But can we be confident that the messages we are receiving are true? Making a message secure and ensuring that it is not a lie are independent problems. We have only solved the first.
I just saw Buzz Aldrin on the TV (run with me here...) and thought, "He seems pretty lively for an oldster." So I got out my phone and asked it how old he is.
"Buzz Aldrin is 85 years old," it said to me. I am reasonably sure that it wasn't lying, and - if I were to go online - I could find multiple independent sources that would allow me to confirm his age. Their independence assures me that 85 is almost certainly the correct answer. It would require a conspiracy of Kennedy-was-assasinated-by-NASA-during-the-moon-landing proportions to think that all those sources of information had been got at and that I had been lied to.
And the answer 85 was given to me by a machine that understood my question. No human being (apart from me) was involved.
So how about an online document checker that scans texts and tells you how likely they are to be true? It would use the multiple-independent-sources technique to work up a score. It could give you an overall statistic ("This is probably correct at a level of 93%."), and it could rate individual statements for both accuracy and uncertainly.
Thus if my document said:
Buzz Aldrin is 85. My father was 31 years old when I was born. The Moon is 6000 years old.
I'd get a correctness level of around 50% and an uncertainty level of around 30%. (The first two statements are true and the third is false. But the system would obviously have much more trouble verifying the middle statement than the other two.)
Your document would come back coloured:
Buzz Aldrin is 85. My father was 31 years old when I was born. The Moon is 6000 years old.
so you could see at a glance what to believe, what not to believe, and what needed further investigation.
Whenever you got a communication from a lawyer (or - if you are a suspicious sort - a lover) you could fire it at the system and see what colour it came back
The system could crawl the web, paying particular attention to advertising copy, political manifestos, and estate agents' property descriptions. Then - if you selected the TRUTH option in your browser - whenever you visited a website it would be pre-coloured for you so you could see if it was all lies...
Wow this is a really good under-researched idea. The color-coding would be wonderful to work with. The idea of several independent sources is used by the Bitcoin blockchain together with economic incentive for telling the truth (about past transactions).
ReplyDeleteSearch engine optimization might be big, important and expensive today, but truth engine optimization in the future, that will be crazy =P